Lis-e-Journals Survey Results - 15th May 2008
Bev Acreman, Marketing Officer, UKSG and Taylor & Francis
We regularly review lis-e-journals to make sure it is still working for all parts of the UKSG’s community – see www.uksg.org/about for further details.
The good news is that it certainly seems to be! We received a 10% response rate to the survey, with just over half of respondents coming from High Education libraries (52%). 17% worked for publishers, 10% for vendors or intermediaries and 4% worked in a corporate library or information management department. 16% were “other” - including NHS, Government, Museums, Research Councils, Consultancy Charities and NGOs. 26% of respondents were based outside of the UK.
“Often I see a problem or its resolution on the list before we've discovered it ourselves. Announcements from publishers are also helpful.” - Independent special research library from United States of America
On the whole, 96% of respondents felt that the discussion list supported their ability to do their job all or some of the time. As would be expected the largest % of satisfied customers were high education librarians, but 94% of publishers and 100% of vendors/intermediaries who responded also felt positive about the usefulness of the list. More work is needed in making the list useful for Corporate librarians with 14% not finding it useful at all.
Some action points for further discussion at the UKSG include:
- the list is intended to be useful for discussing e-resources issues more generally, not just journals. We need to find ways of making this clear without diluting the useful discussions already under way
- our readers outside the UK often felt that the discussions were very UK-centric, which was curious to us as the issues raised are more likely global. We would welcome more interaction from our non-UK readers.
- we need to draft guidelines for our publisher/vendor readers and posters as to what should be posted to lis-e-journals and what should go to Serials E-News which publishes press releases
- no question is a dumb question, and lurkers who are feeling timid should be encouraged to post their thoughts and questions
- widening the scope to include more on licensing, eBooks, Cataloguing policies, use of aggregator services, “Best practice” guidelines, readers’ perspectives on industry issues and publishing industry news
- More comment – perhaps a weekly digest of blog postings or other discussions relevant to the list
- Possibly a change of name for the discussion list to better reflect a wider scope
Your feedback is welcome - please post it to the list at lis-e-journals@jiscmail.ac.uk or to marketing@uksg.org
The full report is posted on our website at: http://www.uksg.org/news/survey-results-2008 , and our thanks to Lesley Crawshaw, University of Hertfordshire and Louise Cole, Kingston University for their hard work keeping the list going and relevant.

